This was another book picked by my book group. It seems like we have better discussions when we read books that aren’t contemporary. More to talk about than just whether we liked it or didn’t like it. For Burr, we talked about Burr’s version of events versus Vidal’s views versus what actually happened in history. I didn’t really remember much about the standard history book version of Burr other than the duel with Alexander Hamilton. Vidal celarly knew a lot more than that—his research is impressive in its scope and detail. The historical detail sometimes makes reading Burr feel more like reading a history than a novel. Interesting as Burr was, I did find myself getting bogged down in the history at times, particularly in the political machinations. Sometimes it was hard to remember which character was which, only helped by the fact that many of the names were familiar.
What Vidal adds to the history and what keeps the book interesting are the characters’ opinions and motivations. After all of the worshipful books about the Founding Fathers over the last few years, it was fun to read Vidal cutting them down to size. From Washington’s fat arse to Davy Crockett’s drunken ranting, no one makes it through unscathed.
By describing the beginning of America’s democracy and early presidents establishing and pushing the boundaries of presidential power, Vidal is commenting on the risks of an imperial presidency. Burr was written in th 1970s, so he was probably talking about Nixon, but reading it now, it could just as easily be about Bush.
My company published The Zuni Cafe Cookbook a few years ago, and I had never really gotten around to making anything from it. Everything seemed too involved. And since our grocery store is small and not very well stocked with anything not Polish, it seemed like too much of a pain to get a long list of fancy ingredients.
Various people at the office had raved about the Roast Chicken and Bread Salad though, and I finally managed to give it a try. It was well worth it, and didn’t take nearly as long as I thought it would. I salted the chicken in the morning instead of a day or two in advance because a coworker said that days in advance wasn’t necessary. Then, about an hour and a half before we sat down to eat, I toasted the bread and then roasted the chicken while assembling the salad.
It was well worth it. The crusty chunks of bread are saturated with vinaigrette and chicken drippings, contrasting with the bitter arugala and sweet currants and pine nuts. And the roast chicken pieces were the best roast chicken I’d ever had.
The only real problem was that cooking the chicken on very high heat managed to set off our smoke detector over and over. Lucky for us, we have an extra-safe one that’s wired into the building and only has battery for backup, so we couldn’t even take out the battery to make it stop. We finally pointed the fan directly at the smoke detector for the rest of the cooking time. If I ever make this again, I’m definitely turning on all the fans and opening all the windows before I start.
I saw this on a craft blog and decided I had to make one. Never mind that I have no idea how to crochet. And have not been very successful at knitting. And of course I wouldn’t want to start with something small.
So I checked out a pile of crochet books from the library. I managed to teach myself the stitchs I needed to make the ripple blanket. I didn’t bother to learn any of the other stitches (I’m lazy like that). And started.
So far I have this. I know it’s just two stripes, but it’s progress. It’s far from perfect, but I’m pretty happy with it. It’s taking a long time partially because I’m pretty slow and partially because it’s really wide—I want it to fit on our queen size bed. I bought a pile of yarn in bright colors—red, orange, celery green, chocolate brown, royal purple, pale blue, teal, and navy—to match the bright colors in our apartment. I have no plan for color sequence, just going to make it up as I go along. I am finding crochet easier than knitting—it seems to only need two hands, one for hook and one for yarn, whereas knitting always seemed like it needed three. And the size of my stitches seem to be more consistent with crochet.
I’m not sure how long this is going to take me. I’m hoping to finish before it gets too hot to have it draped across my lap. If I don’t finish it by then, I suspect it will sit around until fall.
At first this was reminding me a lot of The Secret History, Dead Poets’ Society, etc., where a group of private school students become incredibly close, guided by a special teacher, and then something tragic happens. Plus a heaping dose of postmodern pretentiousness. But in the last part of the book, Pessl throws in a completely unexpectedly plot twist. On one hand, it made the end of the book a page-turner, but on the other hand, it was unexpected because it was extremely implausible. A fun read overall, but I didn’t think it held together very well.
After 3 days of watching live music for 12 hours a day (1 p.m. to 1 a.m.), I’m exhausted. I’ve seen so many bands that they all run together in my head. Alex had to spend his days at the Blender House, working on his chicken and bee drawings, so I went to the day shows on my own. That was probably my favorite part—what could be better than escaping New York winter to hang out in the Austin sunshine, listening to music, beer in one hand, taco in the other. For the curious (Toby), these are the bands I saw. Most of them I even sort of remember.
Thursday
Sparklehorse (somewhat unclear on how Mark Linkous manages to still be alive)
Lily Allen (she was pretty adorable)
Robyn Hitchcock and Peter Buck (why do aging rock stars insist on wearing those shirts)
The Phantom Family Halo (horrible—singer playing the drums, three guys on keyboards)
The Sights (a relief after the previous band)
Midnight Movies (pretty good)
The Office (they were nice)
Jamie T (I was mostly asleep at this point)
Friday
Danbert Nobacon (He was fun, but his between song banter made him seem craaazy)
Scissors for Lefty (eh)
Great Northern (wasn’t paying much attention)
Margot & the Nuclear So & So’s (didn’t hear much of them)
Sloan (wasn’t paying much attention)
Keren Ann (really awesome, playing in a great venue—a church sanctuary)
Willy Mason (the people on the pew in front of us were making out. ew!)
The Fratellis (feuding with another band in the audience. we were rooting for the fratellis)
Albert Hammond, Jr. (a Stroke. Playing music like the Strokes, but boringer)
Saturday
Rock Plaza Central (didn’t hear much of them)
65daysofstatic (noise band who blew the circuit twice, then gave up)
Dirty Sweet (these guys really really wish it were the seventies)
Maritime (pretty good)
VivaL’AmericanDeathRayMusic (happy to be sitting on a couch at this point, wasn’t really listening)
Daniel Johnston (good, weird. but good.)
I wasn’t sure if I would love this movie or hate it. In the end, it was something in the middle. Sofia Coppola tells pretty much the same story in every movie, a lonely girl overwhelemed by her world. And her movies tend to be much more about mood and images than about plot. Her first film, The Virgin Suicides, was my favorite. The melancholy mood and misty camera work really work with the suburban gothic story. I had liked the book by Jeffrey Eugenides, and I was pleased that the film captured the mood of the book. With Lost in Translation, I found it very captivating in the theater and got swept up in the movie’s slow rhythm and introspection. When I saw it again at home, I found the main character whiny and annoying.
In Marie Antoinette, Coppola is again telling a story about a girl who is in over her head. The situation of the young queen is bizarre and impossible—she’s forced to leave everything she knows to go marry a prince she’s never met. She creates sort of a fantasy world of extravagance which then becomes part of why the French people turn against her.
I didn’t mind the lack of specific historical event details—that’s not really what you look for in a Sofia Coppola movie. The scenes filmed at Versailles were incredible—amazing to see what it must have really been like. But sometimes it seemed like Coppola got a little carried away with the clothes, shoes, pastries, etc. And while I left the film feeling sympathetic towards Marie Antoinette, that she was primarily a victim of circumstances, I also thought that she seemed like a beautiful little idiot, sort of a historical Paris Hilton.
Comparing this movie and the book it’s based on really illuminates some of the strengths and weaknesses of film and writing. In the book we see everything entirely through Barbara; the reader is in her head. In film, the viewer can’t be in a character’s head in the same way. Barbara’s narration is there in voice-over, but as viewers, we still see her from the outside. The ending of the book is much creepier than the movie—I suppose they wanted the movie to have a friendlier ending with a bit of hope.
The film succeeds in showing some of the other characters in a way that make them much more sympathetic than in the book. Sheba’s affair with the student seems much more believable when we see it happen than in the book where we hear about it only from Barbara. Richard, Sheba’s husband, is much more sympathetic in the movie, probably at least in part because he’s played by Bill Nighy.
I was pleased that the movie clocks in at only an hour and a half. It’s a spare, concise novel and the movie is as well. Since every movie these days seems to run over two hours, it’s a relief to see one that doesn’t have a single extraneous scene.